Search for: "THE DEBTOR v. DOE" Results 21 - 40 of 2,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by Donald Dinnie
The court found that s 14(1) does not state to whom an acknowledgment must be made to interrupt prescription – simply that such an acknowledgment must be made by the debtor. [read post]
While the UPC qualifies to submit request for preliminary rulings to the CJEU in accordance with Article 267 of the TFEU, the PMAC does not. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:10 pm by Matthias Weller
In 2021, the receivables arising from those loan agreements were assigned to Inkreal, another purely Slovak business corporation, who upon non-payment by the debtor brought action in the Czech Republic. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by Tristan Marot
The Free State High Court confirms in J.H.V v Centlec (SOC) Ltd and Others that an acknowledgement of liability by the debtor interrupts prescription, even if the acknowledgement is not made directly to the creditor. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 1:20 pm by Caitlin Truelove
Does this mean that the creditor is barred from domesticating its judgment in the state of North Carolina and pursuing the judgment debtor or property located in North Carolina? [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
This approach would facilitate the change of insolvency forum while providing a level of protection to creditors that does not currently exist. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by Edelboim Lieberman Revah PLLC
If a business does not qualify to file under Subchapter V for any reason, then initiating the bankruptcy process under Subchapter V will lead to both unnecessary costs and unnecessary delays. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:30 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Prescription does not run until the creditor has knowledge of the identity of the debtor or the facts which the debt arises (section 12(3) of the Prescription Act of 1969). [read post]