Search for: "Target Employee 1"
Results 21 - 40
of 6,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2008, 10:11 pm
Except some of the facts in his post look a little different from the Target brief and the judge's opinion.1. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:03 pm
The elements in a slip and fall case are: 1. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:35 pm
Human Resources and payroll professionals are being targeted by sophisticated cyber criminals to steal employee data. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 12:26 am
While it is true that the hackers involved in the Target breach were targeting credit car [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:23 am
The IRS has threatened employers with PPACA penalties of $36,500 per employee, per year, nondeductible. [read post]
27 May 2020, 7:00 am
The H-1B visa program is aggressively targeted in this new piece of legislation. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:05 am
Here are three crucial steps for effective employee sensing: 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 6:59 am
The employee retention credit (ERC) can be a tremendous boon for eligible employers to claim substantial cash refunds for keeping their employees on the payroll during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:26 am
The employees regarded the move as retaliation.Read more here. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 12:13 pm
Generally, there are three primary types of forensic image collection techniques: 1) creating a physical forensic image of the device; 2) collecting a logical image; or 3) doing a targeted collection of device data. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:51 pm
As for the purpose of requiring the reports, Senate Bill 973 pulls no punches: state government agencies will use the reports against employers for “targeted enforcement” of California pay equity, anti-discrimination and wage and hour laws. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:16 pm
Effective January 1, 2017, section 925 provides as follows: (a) An employer shall not require an employee who primarily resides and works in California, as a condition of employment, to agree to a provision that would do either of the following: (1) Require the employee to adjudicate outside of California a claim arising in California. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:48 pm
In an Advice Memorandum released Thursday, the NLRB’s Division of Advice concluded that employees who discussed an employer’s tip-pooling practices engaged in protected concerted activity, such that discharging the employees for this activity violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 11:57 am
The central argument is that preventing an employee from working for a competitor for a period of time after they cease to work for their current employer “interfere[s] with, restrain[s], or coerce[s]” [Section 8(a)(1), NLRA] him or her from exercising their right to “engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection” [Section 7, NLRA], as restricting alternative employment opportunities would… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
The sexual harassment policy must contain the following elements: (1) a prohibition on sexual harassment; (2) the definition of sexual harassment under Illinois and federal law; (3) examples of prohibited conduct that would constitute unlawful sexual harassment; (4) the internal complaint process of the employer available to the employee; (5) the legal remedies and complaint process through the Illinois Department of Human Rights; (6) a prohibition on retaliation for reporting… [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
The bill has failed in the past but was introduced in the Senate on April 1. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
But recently, class action lawyers have begun to target insurance companies with claims that carriers have misclassified these sales agents as ICs instead of employees. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 2:25 pm
That directive provides the criteria by which OSHA will conduct the 2008 Site-Specific Targeting (“SST-08”) plan. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 1:35 pm
U.S. and California law provide very specific discrimination protections for employees who have historically been the greatest targets. [read post]
31 May 2023, 7:35 am
(As we recently reported, the number of states permitting noncompete will soon drop to 46, as the Governor of Minnesota just signed a bill rendering void and unenforceable noncompetes signed on or after July 1, 2023.) [read post]
