Search for: "Taylor v City of New York" Results 21 - 40 of 419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CME's union and the City of New York [City] entered into an agreement to settle the matter in which the CME agreed to a 30-day suspension without pay "in full satisfaction of the disciplinary matter. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CME's union and the City of New York [City] entered into an agreement to settle the matter in which the CME agreed to a 30-day suspension without pay "in full satisfaction of the disciplinary matter. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., Local 237 Intl. v City of New York, 99 AD2d 264, affirmed 64 NY2d 188.* Finding that PERB's decision regarding Petitioner's fair representation claim had "a rational basis," the Appellate Division said it "must affirm" PERB's determination. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., Local 237 Intl. v City of New York, 99 AD2d 264, affirmed 64 NY2d 188.* Finding that PERB's decision regarding Petitioner's fair representation claim had "a rational basis," the Appellate Division said it "must affirm" PERB's determination. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Union presence during an interrogation of a unit member by the appointing authority Seabrook v City of New York, 57 AD3d 232 Norman Seabrook, individually and as President of the Correction Officers' Benevolent Association, challenged the policy of not allowing an employee to consult with a union representative after a question is posed and before an answer must be given, at an interrogation conducted pursuant to [New York City]… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
  His attorney told the New York Law Journal that Taylor will seek permission to appeal. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Appellate Division holds Civil Service Law Article 14 trumps Second Class Cities Law Article 9 with respect to negotiating police disciplinary proceduresCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Negotiating disciplinary procedures for City of Schenectady police officers held a prohibited subject of collective bargainingCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating procedures to implement and administer… [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Union presence during an interrogation of a unit member by the appointing authoritySeabrook v City of New York, 2008 NY Slip Op 09471, Decided on December 4, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentNorman Seabrook, individually and as President of the Correction Officers' Benevolent Association, challenged the policy of not allowing an employee to consult with a union representative after a question is posed and before an answer must be given, at an… [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]