Search for: "Teague v. Johnson*"
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm
In both contexts, Johnson “narrows the the scope of a criminal statute by interpreting its terms,” Schriro, 542 U.S. at 351-52, it “alters the range of conduct or the class of persons that the law punishes,” id. at 352, and “prohibit[s] a certain category of punishment for a class of defendants because of their status or offense,” Saffle v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:27 am
Citing its 1989 precedent in Teague v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
United States and Dimaya v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
McDaniel v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:13 pm
Antitrust Teague v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:21 am
The majority further went on to hold that it was not creating a "new rule" within the meaning of Teague v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In a 2007 dissent in James v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
But Davis v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
United States 17-1366 Issues: (1) Whether the retroactivity analysis of Teague v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Allen v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Teague, 286 N.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
Last up is Wright v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
