Search for: "Texas v. Biden"
Results 21 - 40
of 815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
Arizona v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
MARBURY V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
The Blocked Enforcement of the PWFA in Texas In State of Texas v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
" The platforms challenged the law on First Amendment grounds in NetChoice v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:25 pm
The lawsuit (State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:15 am
Judge Hendrix summarizes his opinion in Texas v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:04 am
In 2000, just before the Bush v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am
This is illustrated by the cases involving the student-loan plan (Biden v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:27 am
Papish v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: As Supreme Court weighs abortion drug, a look at pill usage since Roe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:53 am
Texas and other states have been reduced to passive observers as the Biden Administration maintains an effective open border. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm
Judge Irma Ramirez, the other judge joining her opinion, is a recent Biden appointee. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
In Texas Bankers Association v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:16 pm
In sum, there is good reason to worry about government use of coercion to either suppress speech (as the Biden Administration may well have done in Murthy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]