Search for: "The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co." Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972).The court also rejected the notion that Diamond Bermuda was engaged in an impermissible collateral attack on the Netherlands judgment, on the grounds that while in general a party cannot collaterally attack the merits of a foreign judgment, it can do so on one of the limited grounds in the UFCMJRA.Judge Frost dissented and raised what I think is a strong point. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court largely relied on M/S Bremen v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
To determine whether the district court properly dismissed a claim based on a forum selection clause, the appeals court turned to the Supreme Court’s decision in M/S Bremen v Zapata Off-Shore Co. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 3 (1972) (construing a venue provision to be mandatory where it provided: “Any dispute arising must be treated before the London Court of Justice. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 3 (1972) (construing a venue provision to be mandatory where it provided: “Any dispute arising must be treated before the London Court of Justice. [read post]