Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Mitchell" Results 21 - 40 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 5:57 pm
Defendant: Envy The Look, LLC, Justin Mitchell Case Number: 8:2008cv00444 Meints v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Florida enacted a law that prohibits restaurants and bars from showing "adult live performances" to children. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:48 pm
Martinez has been a member of The Florida Bar since 1997. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mitchell, No. 06-516 Conviction for aggravated identity theft is reversed where defendant did not couple his use of the name "Marcus Jackson" a sufficient amount of correct, distinguishing information to identify a specific Marcus Jackson, as required by the statute. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:00 am by Ezra Rosser
ReevesChair, The Florida Board of Bar Examiners andPartner, Moseley Prichard Parrish Knight & Jones Kellye Y. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
“Standing and capacity related dismissals are not on the merits” (Favourite Ltd. v Cico, 208 AD3d 99 [1st Dept 2022]), and are deemed to be “without prejudice” (B and H Florida Notes LLC v Ashkenazi, 182 AD3d 525 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:30 am by Lyle Denniston
  In December 1970, the Court split 5-to-4 in the case of Oregon v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Feb. 11, 2009) (applying exception in Florida statute to reject personal injury-based consumer fraud claim); Gorran v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
 In fact, a few years back in Poindexter v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
  Unlike certain fish-fry establishments, the Court can be very generous about repeat visits to its all-you-can-eat relist bar:  up for a seventh helping since the Court denied the petitioner in forma pauperis status is Fairey v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:26 am by Susan Brenner
On August 6, 2009, Florida prosecutors charged Feldman with one count of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm by cdw
Still reading Alfred Brian Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Conway, No. 06-4083 "A sentence pursuant to a plea to possession of ammunition is affirmed over challenges to the district court's possession-of-a-shotgun enhancement arguing that: 1) he did not possess the shotgun; 2) the "relevant conduct" provisions of the sentencing guidelines do not apply to this conduct; 3) the sentencing guidelines preclude courts from enhancing sentences based on charged conduct where the government later dismisses the charge in connection with a plea… [read post]