Search for: "The People v. Harper"
Results 21 - 40
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Harper.] [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
"In Collins v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Sandra Day O’Connor’s Copyright Legacy — The Copyright Alliance’s Rachel Kim takes a look at three major copyright decisions penned by Justice O’Connor, who passed away December 1: Harper & Row Publishers v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
Harper, COA23-206, ___ N.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
See Leser v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 3:11 am
In the case of Courvoisier v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 3:20 pm
Harper. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Harper; 303 Creative v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Sony v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Yet he emphasizes that "we don't always line up 6-3, 5-4, the way some people tend to think. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
You’ve started to delegate to the right people. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
Harper, 864 F.2d 85, 86 (9th Cir. 1988). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Harper as evidence that the Court is not "partisan. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
