Search for: "The People v. Hoffman"
Results 21 - 40
of 295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
See Rowan v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
We should not lightly attribute that intent to the Legislature, particularly given California’s “strong public policy to protect children of tender years” (People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
”[13]And it is in no small part thanks to this work of repudiation that more people on the left as well as on the right now recognize the hollowness of liberalism’s pretensions to neutrality. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
For many people, Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
A Review of Health Care in the Court July 18, 2022 | Allison Hoffman, University of Pennsylvania Law School Several U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Hoffman and Strezhnev suggested that virtual courts, easier rescheduling opportunities, and improved mass transit systems would increase access to eviction hearings for many people. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
Allwright, Shelley v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
., joined the growing ranks of members of Congress in issuing a warning to the Supreme Court: reaffirm Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
“We shall not defeat Amerika,” proclaimed Abbie Hoffman, leader of the leaderless Yippies, “by organizing a political party. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
Martinez wielded the court’s pre-Dickerson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 8:56 am
United States gave Miranda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:10 am
Hay's cause of action is precluded by Hoffman v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm
James Landolt v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Hoffman-LaRoche v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 8:18 am
(Perhaps the most famous case is Katz v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 10:17 am
Ferra v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:58 pm
” Parkson v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
Happy people just don’t shoot their husbands. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm
Katz v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 2:46 pm
A version of "Name That Tune" with respect to opinions from the California Court of Appeal would be to attempt to accurately and summarize the thing in as few sentences as possible.For this opinion from today, I can Name That Tune in a single sentence:The evidence isn't insufficient as a matter of law to keep someone detained as an SVP when he's a repeat child molester who forthrightly admits that he can't guarantee that he won't molest another child upon his release,… [read post]
