Search for: "The People v. James Phillips" Results 21 - 40 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 11:45 am by Josh Blackman
[James Phillips and I grade the four linguistic claims made in the Heller case using corpus linguistics.] [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am by Eric Goldman
Amicus brief from IP/Internet/Antitrust professors. * FTC opinions: majority by Commissioner Simons, concurrence by Commissioner Slaughter, dissent by Commissioner Phillips. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Curtis v Phillips (Civil Dispute) [2020] ACAT 115- a case concerning a Facebook post which made alleged defamatory comments against the claimant and how they conducted their cake making business. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Cuomo Memorandum In Support for Temporary Restraining Order We are grateful to Professor Stephanie Barclay (Notre Dame), who filed an amicus brief on behalf of various Muslim groups and Professor James Phillips (Chapman) who filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Cuomo Memorandum In Support for Temporary Restraining Order We are grateful to Professor Stephanie Barclay (Notre Dame), who filed an amicus brief on behalf of various Muslim groups and Professor James Phillips (Chapman) who filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm by JB
Josh Blackman, James Phillips, and John Yoo argue that a federal mandate to wear masks to prevent the spread of coronavirus would be unconstitutional under NFIB v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:19 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  So, predictably, conservative legal academics Josh Blackman, James Phillips, and John Yoo have responded by asserting that neither the President nor Congress have the power to take such measures. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
Oh, my goodness, some — some people thought that he was criminally irresponsible, and others thought he was a genius. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
” At Notice & Comment, a blog from the Yale Journal on Regulation, James Phillips pinpoints a key passage from Justice Clarence Thomas’ majority opinion in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
James Phillips at PrawfsBlawg explores the “warring views” on the religion clauses revealed by Justice Elena Kagan’s approach to the two cases. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:03 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Phillips doesn’t mention that case, but he does try to reconcile his reading with Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Montana Department of Revenue, in which the court held last week that Montana’s exclusion of religious schools from a state-funded scholarship program for private schools violates the First Amendment, comes from James Phillips at PrawfsBlawg and Anthony Sanders at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
For the record, in Ordered Liberty (2013), a book I co-authored with James E. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, James Phillips and Josh Blackman doubt that corpus linguistics, a “tool [that] allows researchers to search millions of documents to see how words were used during the founding era, and could help courts determine how the Constitution was understood at that time,” will help the court “definitively resolve” the original meaning of the Second Amendment in cases such as this term’s New York State Rifle & Pistol Association… [read post]