Search for: "Thomas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 2 March, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Tooth. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v… [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
On Thursday 18 February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Rittson-Thomas and Ors v Oxfordshire County Council. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
In the Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs sued five defendants: (1) The United States of America, (2) the Department of Health and Human Services, (3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services, (4) the Internal Revenue Service, and (5) the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
But Republican legislators openly advocated for the impeachment of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen in 2016 because of the IRS’s responses to their subpoenas. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Many of the citations deal with eminently practical matters, but the courts have also thought it beneficial to call upon the philosophers for a variety of more strictly “philosophic” notions, for example, Thomas Aquinas on the doctrine of free will, and Bertrand Russell on logical constructions. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
Internal Revenue Service is a good example of this approach. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm
Commissioner, a challenge to the Internal Revenue Service's treatment of cost-sharing arrangements for employee stock compensation. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
Director of Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue, Judge Hardiman’s opinion for the Court held that prior to 2004, taxpayers could establish “bona fide residence” regardless of whether their intent was to avoid tax liability or not. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue suggested that both of those factors — and final decision-making — are mandatory. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:15 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue), the dissenting Justice John Harlan wrote him privately to say he was “sorry” that he could not “sign up at once with your first. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
V. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Thomas E. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
There has been a constant battle between wealthy taxpayers who have endeavoured to avoid or minimise the taxes that they pay, on the one hand, and revenue authorities who are charged with ensuring that everybody meets their legal obligations in relation to tax, on the other. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., [2008] 3 SCR 265 At the outset, it is appropriate to refer to the words of Judson J. for this Court in Commissioner of Patents v. [read post]
