Search for: "Thompson v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2021, 7:17 am by Family Law
From Law.com: The Pennsylvania Superior Court helped clarify what warrants a deviation from the child support guidelines in the recent matter of Thompson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
  The various issues raised by the commission’s subpoenas and other requests for information are complex, and largely unanswered by the courts. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:57 am by Amy Howe
” Here’s a full list of the cases scheduled for argument in the November session: Thompson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Because libel was a common-law tort, state courts could easily preserve a constitutionally narrowed form of civil libel action just by adapting state tort law rules to fit the Court's emerging libel caselaw, and doing so with each new Court decision. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:10 pm by Chantal Bernier
  In 2016, the Ontario Superior Court went a step further in R. v Rogers Communications siding with Rogers and Telus, which had refused to grant the Peel Regional Police a “tower dump” of cell phone data to investigate a robbery. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:10 pm by Chantal Bernier
  In 2016, the Ontario Superior Court went a step further in R. v Rogers Communications siding with Rogers and Telus, which had refused to grant the Peel Regional Police a “tower dump” of cell phone data to investigate a robbery. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
Superior Court, alleging that Simberg’s and Steyn’s commentary defamed him. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of DEI Films v Tiwari 2018 ONSC 4423 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action under Ontario’s anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
Because a group health plan covered room and board expenses for stays at skilled nursing facilities, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) required it to do so for residential mental health treatment facilities as well, a federal appeals court ruled in Danny P. v. [read post]
Because a group health plan covered room and board expenses for stays at skilled nursing facilities, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) required it to do so for residential mental health treatment facilities as well, a federal appeals court ruled in Danny P. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am by MOTP
Ross, for Jo Ann Rivera, John Schaefer, Jessica Schaefer, Hilary Kulik, Gretchen Thompson, Ronald Schaefer, Jr. and Matthew Schaefer, Amicus Curiae. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:14 pm by Steven M. Sweat
The California Supreme Court recently ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:14 pm by Steven M. Sweat
The California Supreme Court recently ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]