Search for: "Thornton "
Results 21 - 40
of 1,951
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
., by Paul Thornton (L.A. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:37 am
”However, through numerous challenges to the SEC rulemaking, in court and otherwise, opponents are making the process more burdensome and impeding the ability of the agency to do its job, Thornton said. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Thornton (George Washington), Steven L.... [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Thornton, a divided Supreme Court ruled that states could not add qualifications for office for members of Congress in addition to those explicitly stated in the Constitution. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Thornton, a 1995 case, which says that that states had no power to add term limits or additional qualifications for congressional candidates. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Thornton, a 1995 case, which says that that states had no power to add term limits or additional qualifications for congressional candidates. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
Thornton, 514 U. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Thornton, but there was an extension of doctrine here that was barely acknowledged. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:43 pm
Thornton (1975), the three justices thought “our Constitution leaves some questions to the States while committing others to the Federal Government. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:51 am
Thornton, 514 U. [read post]
SCOTUS Ducking the Trump Eligibility Question Now will Pressure the Court to Rule in his Favor Later
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
Thornton that states may not add qualifications to the ones provided in the Constitution. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
The most remarkable thing about last Thursday’s oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Thornton, because two-thirds of both Houses of Congress might still vote to remove the Section 3 disqualification for Trump if he’s elected. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
[The states do not need Section 3 to impose qualifications on state-created positions. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” that Colorado Law Doesn’t AuthorizePart Eight: The First Amendment/Right to Vote/Federalism-Based "Off-Ramp" Argument that Might Carry the DayPart Nine: Ten Arguments that Petitioners Haven’t Raised (or that Trump Only Invoked Late in the Game) [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Thornton, which barred the states from adding additional qualifications to federal offices. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
Thornton), the Court went to great trouble to explain why the state law there was consistent with the Court’s First Amendment/voting rights precedents. [read post]
