Search for: "Trojan v. Trojan"
Results 21 - 40
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
ARTECHOUSE, New York; Picture Courtesy of Atreya MathurBy Kelsey Clifford Art is a consistent escape from reality. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 3:11 am
" Petróleos Mexicanos v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 10:41 am
Marchand v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1946 Supreme Court decision in SEC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 8:16 pm
”); Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:50 pm
Pannu v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am
Amniotic Fluid / Amniotic Membrane Tissue Audits, Investigations and Prosecutions are Continuing to Climb in 2022 (August 4, 2022): Over the past year, we have seen a significant increase in the number of Medicare administrative audits, False Claims Act investigations and criminal prosecutions by the Department of Justice (DOJ), related to the billing of allogeneic (harvested from someone else) stem cell products. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm
Recognizing the ‘Trojan Horse’, ‘Appraisal by Ambush’ and other common ‘Tactics’ of the Appraisers. 12. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am
This provision is a trojan horse for government censorship that has nothing to do with protecting the kids or even privacy. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:37 pm
We mentioned AHA v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
It prohibits apps from containing malware (malicious or harmful code or programs) or other internal components (such as computer viruses, trojan horses or “backdoors”). [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
The decision in O’Malley v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm
The passage makes for a curious mix of transatlantic policy objectives in the areas of steel sector decarbonization, carbon border adjustments, trade defence instruments, and inbound investment screening: Compatible with international obligations and the multilateral rules, including potential rules to be jointly developed in the coming years, each participant in the arrangements would undertake the following actions: (i) restrict market access for non-participants that do not meet conditions of… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:52 am
”] From Callahan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:20 am
In Prakash Singh v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
” It might help at this point to draw out the analogy to the Trojan Horse. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:55 am
In the words of the Justice Department’s Criminal Resource Manual, in order to find someone guilty of violating the RICO statute under the “more expansive view” of U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm
One of the most anticipated decisions of this Supreme Court term—Fulton v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 11:38 am
Holding otherwise, as the GC does, represents, in the opinion of this author, a (disruptive) escamotage in order to have the Contested Design (and, therefore features of appearance that are solely dictated by their technical function) benefit from the exception set out under Art. 8(3).In other words, in the GC’s construction, the concocted concurrent application of both Arts. 8(1) and 8(2) serves the purpose, in the view of this author, to use Art. 8(2) as a “trojan horse”… [read post]
