Search for: "U. S. v. Hair"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
Golan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 10:18 am
" Heading 3305 covers "Preparations for use on the hair. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:41 am
Newsom, 593 U. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:01 pm
S. ___; Gish v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:06 pm
” The key to this result was the court’s interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision in The Bremen v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:24 am
One comment/question struck me, especially in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Snyder v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 12:51 pm
Ruling in a case with the felicitious caption of Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:50 pm
The Superior Court’s opinion clarifies that an employee’s off-duty conduct must have a non-speculative impact on the employer’s business in order to constitute “just cause” for termination.A Hairy SituationThe case of Michael Christopher Designs v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
Relatedly, “[u]npreserved error . . . is reviewed only for plain error. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 8:04 pm
QVC, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
S. 520 (1979), and Block v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:19 am
S. 303, 309 (1980); Le Roy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 2:18 pm
” State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
United States, 520 U. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
According to Philips, Nintendo’s Wii and Wii U consoles infringed three of its patents relating to the interaction between users’ physical bodies and the virtual tennis character that one of Nintendo’s video games allows you to become. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
I awaited an order in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Newsom , 590 U. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
Department of Justice, and then became an assistant U. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
See Dred Scott v. [read post]
