Search for: "U. S. v. Kemp*"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:37 pm
" 18 U. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:03 pm
S., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:56 pm
" 29 U. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
In BCL 1104-a cases, the Court does have the power to compel a buyout, even between 50/50 shareholders (see Zulkofske v Zulkofske, 2012 NY Slip Op 51210(U) [Suffolk Co. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Justice Scheinkman's thorough, 26-page decision in White v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
Co. v Lumberman's Mut. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
I’ve pretty much just described the circumstances present in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], a post-trial decision handed down earlier this month by Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am
” Parties’ Conflicting Submissions Warrant Evidentiary Hearing of Minority Shareholder’s Dissolution Petition Kocak v Dargin, 2017 NY Slip Op 30051(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 4, 2017]. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm
S. 277, 289-290 (1983); see Rummel v. [read post]
Court Rejects Oppressed Shareholder’s Bid for Dissolution or Buy-Out, Finds Money Damages Sufficient
5 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
That’s precisely the issue that the Court considered in the recent case of Hammad v Jamal Kamal Corp, 2020 N.Y. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
., has rejected Sierra Club’s attempt to stop the Department of Energy from providing money or a loan guarantee on a 582-MW coal-fired power plant in Mississippi, until it has fully examined environmental impacts (Sierra Club v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
California, 395 U. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
“[U]nless” plaintiffs have “evidence that what St. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
The Second Department reversed, holding that “[u]nder the facts of this case,” the lower court “should have granted, in effect, the plaintiff’s application for an order authorizing him to purchase the defendant’s interest in the LLC upon its dissolution. [read post]
