Search for: "U. S. v. Kemp"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
The Second Department reversed, holding that “[u]nder the facts of this case,” the lower court “should have granted, in effect, the plaintiff’s application for an order authorizing him to purchase the defendant’s interest in the LLC upon its dissolution. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
After the jump are the panels sponsored by the Law and History CRN a next week's annual meeting in Mexico City. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am
An earlier post on this blog, examining a post-trial decision in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], described the minority shareholder’s dissolution claim under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law as a “classic case of minority shareholder oppression. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am
” Parties’ Conflicting Submissions Warrant Evidentiary Hearing of Minority Shareholder’s Dissolution Petition Kocak v Dargin, 2017 NY Slip Op 30051(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 4, 2017]. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Kemp (481 U.S. 279), which since has been widely criticized. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
I’ve pretty much just described the circumstances present in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], a post-trial decision handed down earlier this month by Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
The case, Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
Perhaps more than his predecessor ever displayed, Judge Johnson recently demonstrated his aptitude for facts and data in serving as a gatekeeper of scientific evidence, as required by the New Jersey Supreme Court, in Kemp v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:30 am
Let’s start with the statutes. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
However, these plaintiffs wisely did not dispute that PMA preemption applies to recalled products.As is usual in lead litigation (see, e.g., Kemp v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 am
Is the controller’s denial of the petitioner’s shareholder status, by itself, enough to establish oppressive conduct under Kemp‘s reasonable-expectations standard? [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Through that witness, the State sought to introduce the following text messages purportedly sent between Amie Dean and Jaquan Dawson: [Amie] Aye I kno the n* * *a whos the hitman fa goldie and he on sum mo n* * *as heads n tyler my dad kno em that's how I seen the n* * *a but look its all bad and sum [Jaquan] O well ok so do u go to work today [Amie] that had said to b snitchn keep it to urself but im lettn u kno without lettn u kno kelly [Jaquan's father] name came up… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Justice Scheinkman's thorough, 26-page decision in White v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Kemp, supra, at 328-329; Crumbley v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm
Kemp. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
What’s that? [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Texas, 509 U. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
State v. [read post]
