Search for: "U. S. v. King"
Results 21 - 40
of 543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
In King v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:49 am
Ripa v Petrosyants 2019 NY Slip Op 32638(U) August 15, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 510658/17 restates the age old principle that one may not successfully sue an attorney unless there was an attorney-client relationship, or something very, very close to it. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 5:47 am
Dial Car Inc. v Tuch & Cohen, LLP 2021 NY Slip Op 30407(U) February 10, 2021 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 514138/20 Judge: Leon Ruchelsman gives a nice description of the current standard of JL § 487 in the Second Department. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
In this 10-year old case, Mawere v Landau 2023 NY Slip Op 34446(U), December 8, 2023 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 501184/12 Judge: Lawrence S. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:17 pm
Term, 2nd Dept., decided 5/27/2008)Kings Civil's grant of summary judgment to plaintiff medical provider REVERSED. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:38 am
Ziemianowicz v Janowski 2019 NY Slip Op 30326(U) February 6, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 521427/2016 Judge: Loren Baily-Schiffman reads as if defendant will now move for summary judgment on the argument that plaintiff owed the real estate broker a commission, and would never have won the underlying case. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 50154(U), Decided on February 2, 2009, Supreme Court, Kings County, Justice Martin Schneier [not officially reported]Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his postion effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:16 am
., LLC. v Rivkin Radler LLP, .2018 NY Slip Op 32913(U) November 13, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 505978/18 Judge: Leon Ruchelsman is an example of what happens when a doctor to doctor business sale goes wrong. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:06 am
Today the Washington Supreme Court hears arguments in King v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 3:50 am
Plaintiffs in 286 Corbin Owners Corp. v Berger, 2022 NY Slip Op., 30018(U) January 3, 2022 Supreme Court, Kings County et Number: Index No. 513265/2020 Judge: Wavny Toussaint suffered storm damage from Sandy, and hired defendant attorneys to litigate. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:52 am
King, 2011 U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:02 am
2017 NY Slip Op 31791(U) August 24, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 503102/16 Judge: Lawrence S. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:35 am
In Fierro v Yellen 2022 NY Slip Op 32959(U) August 31, 2022 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 523796/2021 Judge: Ingrid Joseph, a case that wended its way through Kings Supreme, and on to the Second Department, everyone in the proceedings take fluid positions on whether there was fraud, whether there was a good class action and on Judiciary Law 487. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
Community College v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 5:17 am
Silverstein v Nezhat 2024 NY Slip Op 32173(U) June 24, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 109486/2006 Judge: Kathy J. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:34 am
In Ross v Mashkanta, LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 32873(U) December 23, 2021 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 508310/2019 Judge: Carl J. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:07 am
However, a defendant attorney may not obtain communications .from the plaintiff’s current counsel (see, Jakobleff v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 6:00 am
In Ofman v Tenenbaum Berger & Shivers LLP 2020 NY Slip Op 32828(U) July 23, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 524482/2019 Judge: Richard Velasquez, Plaintiff alleged that had the attorney been quicker, the defendant would not have been able to leave the US and the judgment would have been collectible. [read post]
5 May 2012, 3:07 pm
Supply, Inc. v American Tr. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Disciplinary charges filed in an earlier disciplinary action in which the employee was found not guilty considered in a subsequent disciplinary actionHoffmann v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 2004 NY Slip Op 51952(U), Supreme Court, Kings County, not officially reported, Affd., 21 A.D.3d 493Education Law § 3020-a (4) (b) requires that charges of which the employee has been acquitted be expunged from his or her "personnel records. [read post]
