Search for: "U. S. v. Schwartz" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
  (Slip. op. at 9)  At the time, Sun’s CEO, Jonathan Schwartz, publicly congratulated Google, and he later testified that he didn’t think Google needed Sun’s permission to use the declaring code of the Java API in this manner. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” If an operating agreement contains the word “shall” in the context of advancement or indemnification, the right generally should be considered “mandatory” (Comer v Krolick, 2015 NY Slip Op 32274(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 2, 2015]). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Local JOO AFL-CIO v Schwartz, 32 AD3d 710, 713 [1st Dept 2006] (internal quotations omitted).) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Local JOO AFL-CIO v Schwartz, 32 AD3d 710, 713 [1st Dept 2006] (internal quotations omitted).) [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
If the plaintiff’s alleged injury had been asbestosis, the employer’s knowledge should have sufficed. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Freedom of Expression in Asia, Forthcoming, Lau, Law and Schwartz (eds), Oxford Handbook of Constitutional Law in Asia, Oxford University Press, U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 820 (2019), Adrienne Stone, University of Melbourne – Law School. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 In Saucedo v Pierangelo  2018 NY Slip Op 31750(U)  July 24, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 160330/2016 Judge William Franc Perry explains judicial immunity for a “parenting coordinator. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:29 am by Brian Corrigan
This blog post discusses Schwartz v Bourque, 2017 NY Slip Op 31621(U) (Sur Ct, Nassau County June 14, 2017), a recent decision involving an agreement to make a testamentary disposition as to a specific parcel of real property, a later agreement between the same parties concerning that property (that was alleged to have superseded the earlier agreement), and a deed transferring that same property which was contrary to the terms of the earlier agreement, but not the later… [read post]