Search for: "U.S. v. Fee"
Results 21 - 40
of 9,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2017, 5:29 pm
Gaymar Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 10:04 am
Paralegal fees are once again up for discussion in the U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm
In the case United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:08 am
An early July ruling by the U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:08 am
An early July ruling by the U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:08 am
An early July ruling by the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:24 pm
Freeman v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:08 am
An early July ruling by the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
Spatt U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
Spatt U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:18 pm
In the recent decision of U.S. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:58 pm
Dolan v City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
In Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
§ 145 an applicant must pay attorneys' fees as part of the "expenses" the statute mandates, in NantKwest, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:55 am
Law 360 (registration required) reports that the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:36 am
Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41 (1987); Franklin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 6:43 am
The U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:43 pm
U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 4:44 am
Nash in New York County adopts the Second Department's holding: "Public policy dictates that courts pay particular attention to fee arrangements between attorneys and their clients, as it is important that a fee contract be fair, reasonable, and fully known and understood by the client (see Jacobson v Sassower, 66 NY2d 991, 993, 499 NYS2d 381, 489 NE2d 1283 [1985]; Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 68 NY2d 172, 176, 507 NYS2d 610, 499 NE2d 864… [read post]
