Search for: "U.S. v. Roche*"
Results 21 - 40
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2022, 10:33 am
U.S. and Texas v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
Babbit v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
I Biogen International GmbH (“Biogen”) owns U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Motorola Sols., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 12:38 pm
Wise v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:10 am
The U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am
In University of Rochester v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
The first was Melville Nimmer, who later became a professor at UCLA School of Law and authored a leading treatise on U.S. copyright law. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:50 am
Busk , 547 U.S. 27, 33 (2014). [5] Perez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am
Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am
In 1824, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Gibbons v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:03 am
[Federalist Society SCOTUS Brief video with Jay Schweikert on Ramos v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Silliker Lecturer is selected by a committee including a representative from Merieux NutriSciences, the Program Committee Chairperson, and the IAFP President.2019 Recipient: Robert V. [read post]
