Search for: "UNITED COMMUNITIES, LLC v. USA" Results 21 - 40 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2022, 8:19 am by Andrew Hamm
Enigma Software Group USA, LLC, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that “in an appropriate case, we should consider whether the text of this increasingly important statute aligns with the current state of immunity enjoyed by Internet platforms. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
” Expert witnesses often attempt to bootstrap their causation opinions by reference to determinations of regulatory agencies that are couched in similar language, but which use different quality and quantity of evidence than is required in the scientific community or in civil courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest, Yaminah Williams, Assistant Vice President, Hiscox USA, Alicia Garcia, Claims Counsel, Hiscox USA, Katherine Hausmann, Senior Complex Claims Specialist, Hiscox USA, Elan Kandel, Member, Bailey Cavalieri LLC and James Talbert, Associate, Bailey Cavalieri LLC, review the key 2001 D&O insurance coverage decisions. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm by Josh Blackman
Charter Communications, Inc., 836 F. 3d 925, 930 (CA8 2016); see Gubala v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 6:55 am by Dennis Crouch
, No. 20-1517 (patent eligibility) Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:51 am by Dennis Crouch
LLC, et al., No. 20-1285; Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, although plaintiff raised questions of fact as to the defense, she failed to conclusively establish that the continuous representation doctrine tolled the statute of limitations (see Red Zone LLC v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 27 NY3d at 1050; Town of Amherst v Weiss, 120 AD3d 1550, 1552-1553 [2014]; Deep v Boies, 53 AD3d at 952; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]