Search for: "UNITED STATES et al v. WESTERN DISTRICT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 6:59 am by Docket Navigator
This flagrant refusal to comply with an Order that [defense counsel] concedes was 'crystal clear,' is disrespectful to this Court and fellow Judges of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. . . . [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm by Jay B. Gould
Weston Capital Asset Management, LLC, et al., Civil Action Number 14-CV-80823-COHN, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
Dale Robertson, Civil No. 89-160 and Washington Contract Loggers Assoc. et al., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
And the Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
United States Senate Armed Forces Services Committee, et al., No. 11-1098. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:40 pm by Dave Waller
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in Comité de Apoyo a Los Trabajadores Agrícolas (CATA), et al., v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Earlier, Alderwoods’ employees brought an FLSA action including state law claims in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Prise, et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  In the fall of 1942, he signed a professional contract with the Lockport White Sox of the Class D Pennsylvania, Ontario, and New York League, more commonly known as the PONY League. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Yaroslav Rochniak, et al., in the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied relief in an order entered January 8, 2009.[7] The Court was forced to reconsider its ruling when, on January 26, 2009, the United States Attorney’s Office announced that it had charged Judge Ciavarella and his mentor, Judge Michael T. [read post]