Search for: "UNIVERSAL AM CAN LTD V ATTORNEY GENERAL "
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Barnes, 443 S.W.3d 87, 100 (Tex. 2014); Life Ass'n of Am. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
Plaintiff earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Communications and Media from Fordham University in 2000 and a Juris Doctorate from New York Law School in February of 2004. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
A full discussion of the factors behind the increase securities lawsuit filings levels during 2017 can be found here. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva made an interim order against the Indian Performing Right Society (IPRS), the Phonographic Performance Ltd (PPL) and Novex Communications Pvt Ltd preventing them from contravening section 33 of India's Copyright Act, which provides that only registered societies can grant licences in respect of copyrighted work(s). [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
2005: SEC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
The Parkers sought restitution of the lost value to the trust, damages based on gains of a suitable portfolio over the same period, and attorney's fees. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
But there is also the more general, philosophical discussion worth having about whether one can import “RTBF” into Canada, a country that values freedom of expression and purports to embrace the internet. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Nomura Holding Am., Inc., 104 F. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
When introducing the Supreme Court Bill in December 2002, the Attorney-General, the Hon Margaret Wilson, said that the new Supreme Court was expected to hear about five times the annual number of cases heard by the Privy Council. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
On 18 March 2015, Nicola Davies J heard an application in the case of Lachaux v AOL Ltd. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
On 27 January 2015 Warby J gave judgment in the case of Ames & anr v The Spamhaus Project Ltd ([2015] EWHC 127 (QB)). [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Attorney-General Vanessa Goodwin has suggesting restoring the right of companies to sue individuals for damaging their reputations. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
Generally speaking (though with some potential exceptions), the answer is Oklahoma law, as the California Supreme Court held in McCann v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Oxford University historian Peter Bartrip, for one, noted that Selikoff had testified frequently. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Concordia University, 2006 SCC 19 at paras. 17-22; Hollick v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Suggestions can be made here. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
In his overview, Barca pointed to the Attorney-General’s recent speech at City University London, and this extract: As I said earlier, it is my belief that hitherto the press has been pushing at the boundaries and in a sense has subtly been seeking to explore what is or isn’t acceptable. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
The status quo argument is that judicial discretion is the way to balance the polycentric effects of more compensation to the RP. 2) Conflict of Interest between the RP and the Rest of the Class in its Clearest Form: The Cy-près Settlement In Sutherland, Justice Winkler raises the caution that more compensation for the RP who benefits from the class proceeding to a greater extent than the class members beyond the damages suffered by him/her would create an appearance of a… [read post]
