Search for: "UNIVERSITY MEDICAL v. HEALTH CHOICE, et al." Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm by Schachtman
One author, a pharmacologist trained at the University of Washington, with post-doctoral training at the University of California, Berkeley, and an editor of PloS Biology, was moved to write: “However, the ASA notes, the importance of the p-value has been greatly overstated and the scientific community has become over-reliant on this one – flawed – measure. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:36 pm by S2KM Limited
Brookline Housing Authority et al. on the issue of "whether 42 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:05 am by Mary Zambreno
Hodges, et al., the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution guaranteed the right of same-sex couples to marry and requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out of state. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
              I take up these and other questions in Just Married: Same-Sex Couples, Monogamy, and the Future of Marriage (Princeton University Press, 2015). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
The following is the text of a memo from the Disability Rights Legal Center on its recently filed case Brody et al v California, that aims to expand end-of-life choice to include the option of aid in dying.Background Mentally competent terminally ill patients may find themselves trapped in a dying process they find unbearable, even with excellent pain and symptom management. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm by Schachtman
For better and worse[4], lawyers who litigate health effects issues should read it. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
For better and worse[4], lawyers who litigate health effects issues should read it. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am by Schachtman
  If the media want to avoid being hoisted with their own hypocritical petard, they will look closely at the undisclosed COIs in this new paper by Shelton, et al. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am by Marty Lederman
  See also Part II-B of the amicus brief for the Christian Legal Society, et al. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm by Moshe (Thomas A.) Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.
Burman who brought about a practical application of the philosophical construct of caring into the management of chronic disease (Cumbie, S.A., et al. 2004). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Having turned away from a government-run option, Congress contemplated how to do three things and still preserve the private health insurance industry: (1) achieve near-universal health insurance by devising ways to arrange coverage for some 50 million who don’t have it now; (2) take away the insurance companies’ choice not to cover some people who are ill, have been ill, or are prone to be; and (3) get all of this done at… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
Obama, et al. (11-117); National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. [read post]