Search for: "UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1-30"
Results 21 - 40
of 291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2021, 12:56 pm
You must request this K-1 from your spouse to verify the income. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:00 pm
Upon information and belief, the instrument, and the signature thereto, was obtained and procured by fraud, duress and/or undue influence practiced upon the decedent by the proponent or by other persons acting in concert or privity with her whose names are presently unknown to respondent. 6. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:00 pm
How does an employer recover the tax credit? [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
Senate Bill 276 does two things. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
The concealment of a party's name impedes public access to the facts of the case, which include the parties' identity. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 8:49 pm
The COUNTDOWN TO MODERNITY chart needs to distinguish AMLC from the competing NMPA/NSAI MLC which does not have a name as far as we know. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
As requested, the parties were summoned to oral proceedings. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
It entered into force on 1 April 2021. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
It does not matter all that much that as law, or legal practice, either the lawsuit or the Senate Bill are laughable. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:41 am
” “The fact that the movant ‘has no way of knowing if both parties have been communicating outside this court’ does not change that result. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Cratsley submits that New York law does not place a legal duty upon an individual who lacks control over the third party's actions. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:15 am
Bimbo argued that its trade mark enjoyed such a high reputation that it does not have to prove the aforementioned conditions for an infringement of Art. 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Parties 3. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Parties 3. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
"[1] And if the party witness is not telling the truth, "there is certainly a countervailing public interest in knowing the [witness's] identity. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
No derogation from articles 6, 7, 8 (paragraphs 1 and 2), 11, 15, 16 and 18 may be made under this provision. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
Here’s what we are seeing in our practice. 1. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:15 am
It identifies the patentee and the opponents and, in this context, also mentions third party observations. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:35 am
The Enlarged Board sees no reason to assume, in the absence of an express provision, that Article 106(2) EPC, which stipulates that a decision which does not terminate proceedings as regards one of the parties can only be appealed together with the final decision, unless the decision allows a separate appeal, is also to be applied to the petition for review procedure. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 5:30 am
The first difficulty is thus to identify the parties to the APA.[8] According the APA, the parties are AstraZeneca AB and the European Commission “acting on behalf and in the name of the member states of the European Union”. [read post]
