Search for: "US v. Jarvis" Results 21 - 40 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Reasonable Expectations of Privacy in an Era of Drones and Deepfakes: Expanding the Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in R v Jarvis in Jane Bailey, Asher Flynn & Nicola Henry (eds) The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse (Bing, Kristen Thomasen, University of British Columbia (UBC), Faculty of Law; University of Windsor, Faculty of Law , Suzie Dunn, University of Ottawa; Centre for Law, Technology and Society. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:11 am by Tessa Shepperson
July Justin Bates wrote a post for us on a new case, Jarvis v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 12:45 pm by Giles Peaker
AT/ASTs – Wales has not adopted the ‘hostile environment’ meaning that there is no requirement to undertake the ‘right to rent’ checks for tenants, and despite references by counsel and the Court of Appeal in Jarvis to ground 7B (disqualification from holding tenancy as result of immigration status) this ground actually is unable to be used in Wales. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:55 am by Tessa Shepperson
Welsh landlords cannot serve possession notices if unlicensed This is the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:55 am by Tessa Shepperson
Welsh landlords cannot serve possession notices if unlicensed This is the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm by Stephen Sachs
Bioethics 56 (2010) Judith Jarvis Thomson, Rights and Deaths, 2 Phil. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am by Schachtman
Augustine provided all the equipment used in the experiment. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police and Others [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) The decision of the Administrative Court that the police’s use of facial recognition software was lawful. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
 Not according to a recent decision by a California intermediate appellate court in Jarvis v Jarvis, No. [read post]
In August 2018, an action was filed with the San Francisco Superior Court to invalidate this tax by, among others, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. [read post]