Search for: "US v. Kenneth Brown" Results 21 - 40 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2021, 5:57 am by Howard Friedman
Brown, Annapurna Deborah Waughray, Lalit Khandare & Kenneth Glenn Dau-Schmidt, Bostock v Clayton County Game Changer: US Federal Employment Law Now Covers Caste Discrimination Based on Untouchability, (Forthcoming, New York University Review of Law & Social Change, Vol. 46, 2022).James G. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation,[1] where two former Navy sailors, plaintiffs John DeVries and Kenneth McAffee, sued asbestos-containing product manufacturers and some non-asbestos product manufacturers on claims that they developed lung cancer from their workplace exposure to asbestos. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Ziegler’s analysis of on-the-ground developments shows us that the Court is but one of many drivers of conflict and change in the unpredictable battle over Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris
Although only briefly in private practice, Weinstein did serve as a member of the legendary team of attorneys who worked on the appeal to the Supreme Court of Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
., on paper) that the new system will be used and they must be allowed to opt out of electronic distribution at any time. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Brown, 18-1203, the news service seeks to revisit that decision, arguing that the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [John Kenneth Ross, IJ “Short Circuit” on Davis v. [read post]