Search for: "US v. Mark E. Phillips"
Results 21 - 40
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
” That is, absent an intention, either assumed or specified, what you will have are black marks and white spaces. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
For The Washington Post, Amber Phillips offers “a step-by-step rundown of key moments in the debate on gambling in America that got us to this monumental one. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Darren reports.* YouTube to defend clear examples of fair use, even in courtYouTube to litigate copyright infringement/fair use actions on behalf of users harassed by subject to inappropriate DMCA takedown requests? [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:53 am
By Mark V.B. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:58 am
Phillips of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 1:11 am
In order to comply with subscription agreements you will need to use your own Westlaw password to view cases listed below:
1.
People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
March 28, 2013 Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP) (Upcoming note for Associations+) Just as with any other board of directors, directors of trade and profession associations generally owe duties of loyalty, care and skill to their organizations. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:30 am
April 8, 2013 Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP) (Upcoming note for Associations+) Just as with any other board of directors, directors of trade and profession associations generally owe duties of loyalty, care and skill to their organizations. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:34 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
Sachs Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum -… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow… [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 6:43 am
City of Philadelphia (Kyle Velte, Balkinization) Big Oil asks justices to thwart climate cases (Jennifer Hijazi, E&E News) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:27 pm
From today's Montana Supreme Court opinion in Meyer v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
Burg, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Los Angeles Condemnors’ Special Considerations When Using Outside Counsel – David L. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
” At Balkinization, Mark Tushnet weighs in on Christie v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive… [read post]
