Search for: "US v. Mark Grape" Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am by Jocelyn Bosse
Importantly for this case, VCC produces two types of expensive French red wine involving various up-market grape types. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:22 am
 Case T 420/14 Wine in Black GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Quinta do Noval-Vinhos, SA is a 21 May decision of the General Court of the European Union in a fascinating exercise in comparison of marks for identical goods.In June 2012 Wine in Black applied to register the words Wine in Black as a Community trade mark (CTM) for ‘alcoholic beverages, (except beers), in particular: wines,… [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
” We are looking for balanced and critical views of major aspects of wine regulation, including oenological practices, legal regime of grape varieties, organic wines, land use, plant variety rights, and environmental issues. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:57 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 85940 (WD MI, Aug. 4, 2011), a Michigan federal district court dismissed a Jewish inmate's complaint that his rights were violated when prison authorities would allow him to use a prayer shawl purchased with prison funds only if it was marked as prison property.In Jernigan v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 10:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted) (quoting Jessani v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:47 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
The question of transformative fair use at the heart of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) District Court Delaware imposes limit of ten disputed terms for claim construction in future cases: Grape Tech. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) District Court Delaware imposes limit of ten disputed terms for claim construction in future cases: Grape Tech. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) District Court Delaware imposes limit of ten disputed terms for claim construction in future cases: Grape Tech. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:10 am
  Their case marked a failed attempt to get the Court to strike down the laws of 13 states that allow medical use of marijuana. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
Certification marks differ from trade marks because the owner of the certification mark does not use it - they only allow others who meet the certification standards to use it. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
California Table Grape Commission and US Dep’t of Agriculture (USDA) (Patently-O) CAFC: Offer for sale before invention occurs may bar patentability: August Technology Corp. v. [read post]