Search for: "US v. Thomas Burwell" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
 Other coverage of yesterday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:25 pm by Einer Elhauge
Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito are pure formalists, happy to lead us all into economic disaster if they think that is the linguistically most accurate statutory reading. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:05 am by Jordan Bublick
Supreme Court was presented with the use of "substanially" in the context of "substantially burden[ing] a person's exercise of religion"  Burwell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in King v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am by Amy Howe
’” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie outlines what he describes as “a plausible scenario” in which the Chief Justice “may vote in the liberal direction in both King v Burwell,the Obamacare case, and Obergefell v Hodges, the same-sex marriage case. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
Burwell rely upon a single one of those words—a simple preposition (“by”) buried in a provision (26 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:31 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin and Marci Hamilton list their “top ten” objections to the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services in the wake of last Term’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Amy Howe
”  Although the focus was on same-sex marriage and Alabama, coverage of and commentary on King v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:42 am by Amy Howe
At Wisconsin Appellate Law, Eric Pearson considers what Justice Thomas’s decision for the Court in Baker Botts v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 2:22 am by Amy Howe
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:27 am by Amy Howe
Burwell and Obergefell v. [read post]