Search for: "USA V BENZ" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2014, 6:53 pm by Barry Barnett
And they brought the action in California -- not where Daimler's main United States sub (Mercedes-Benz USA or MBUSA) had incorporated (Delaware) or the state in which MBUSA kept its main place of business. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
A few thoughts on personal jurisdiction following Tuesday's decision in Daimler v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:58 am by Diane Marie Amann
Bauman thus freed the defendant, a corporation whose subsidiary, Mercedes-Benz USA, “is the largest supplier of luxury vehicles to the California market,” from a 2004 lawsuit brought by 22 Argentinians. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC (7/30/12) 208 Cal.App.4th 26, review granted 10/24/12 (Case No. 205263) and briefing deferred pending Iskanian: Putative consumer class action under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and other California statutes. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC The issue:Ibormeith IP, LLC, the assignee of U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The subsidiary is Mercedes-Benz USA. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:41 pm by John Bellinger
  Applying an agency theory, the panel concluded that Daimler AG had sufficient contacts with the state of California by virtue of the actions of its subsidiary Mercedes Benz USA to give California personal jurisdiction over the German parent , even though Mercedes Benz USA had no involvement with the alleged facts in Argentina. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm by Steven B. Katz
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, 145 Cal.Rptr.3d 296 (2012) (rev. granted, briefing held pending Iskanian); Franco v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm by John Bellinger
 Applying an agency theory, the panel concluded, over the objections of the German government, that Daimler AG had sufficient contacts with the state of California by virtue of the actions of its subsidiary Mercedes Benz USA to give California personal jurisdiction over the German parent , even though Mercedes Benz USA had no involvement with the alleged facts in Argentina. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 9:37 am by Steven G. Pearl
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC  (7/30/12) 208 Cal.App.4th 26, review granted 10/24/12 and briefing deferred pending Iskanian v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC  (7/30/12) 208 Cal.App.4th 26, review granted 10/24/12 and briefing deferred pending Iskanian v. [read post]