Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 7:10 am
[1] United States v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:31 am
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has held that Title VII discrimination claims involving “adverse employment actions” require proof of a “cognizable injury. [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:35 pm
The proceedings commenced with the filing of a Notice to Appear (“NTA”) on April 18, 2023, at the Cleveland, Ohio Immigration Court, which is within the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. ... [read post]
24 May 2024, 8:19 am
Allegedly, the defendant subsequently filed an appeal, raising three arguments: first, that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, asserting that the State had not presented sufficient evidence of intent to commit an offense upon entry into the victim’s home; second, that he was entitled to a twelve-person jury under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution; and third,… [read post]
24 May 2024, 8:19 am
Allegedly, the defendant subsequently filed an appeal, raising three arguments: first, that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, asserting that the State had not presented sufficient evidence of intent to commit an offense upon entry into the victim’s home; second, that he was entitled to a twelve-person jury under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution; and third,… [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:52 pm
This is an issue that actually dates back to the seminal 2005 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in Consolidated Edison, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 12:25 pm
Third, we propose three statutory reforms that Congress could pass to restore balance to the branches’ regulation of foreign commerce:1 ) Congress should sunset the president’s imposition of tariffs or other trade restrictions pursuant to economic security statutes after 90 or 180 days without the possibility of renewal unless Congress acts; 2) Congress should prohibit the executive branch from relying on any international agreement as the legal basis under which any good or… [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:07 am
The Board still intends to implement the Final Rule, and is expected to appeal the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Department of Labor (“DOL” or “Department”) released its final fiduciary rule, marking the completion of its third attempt since 2010 to update the definition of what it means to be an investment advice fiduciary to IRAs and ERISA Plans. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:37 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:21 am
(Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:49 am
The United States Supreme Court unanimously held that when a district court compels claims to arbitration, the district court must stay – rather than dismiss – the district court case. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
All of the Courts of Appeals that have addressed the issue have held that the discovery rule applies to the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
United States. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
As recognized by our court of appeals, however, “claims are not preempted if they fall outside the scope of [Section] 301(a)’s express preemption and are not otherwise in conflict with the Act. [read post]
