Search for: "United States Steel Corporation v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm by Patent Arcade Staff
Interplay Entertainment Corporation United States District Court, D. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:32 am
United States Steel Corporation, the Indiana Supreme Court clarified the standard of review that should apply to Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“IURC”) interpretations of a settlement contract falling within the IURC’s regulatory authority.In 1999, the IURC issued an order approving a settlement agreement between NIPSCO and U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
Lee, a director since 1994, is also a director of United States Steel Corporation, Marathon Oil Corporation, The Procter & Gamble Company and The DIRECTV Group, Inc. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
United States Steel Corporation, to be argued on Monday. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:48 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
United States Steel Corporation, counsel for both the employee-plaintiffs and the employer-defendant offered the Court tests for defining what constitutes “changing clothes,” but neither seemed to get much traction. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
NOTE: The Supreme Court case set for argument on Wednesday, Sept. 9, Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Kirstin Dvorchak
He also serves as a director of United States Steel Corporation, Marathon Oil Corporation, and DIRECTV. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:09 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
United States Steel Corporation involved the application of a provision added to the Act in 1949, which allows collective-bargaining agreements to exclude time spent “changing clothes” from the work time subject to the statute. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:56 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION;UNITED STATES STEEL AND CARNEGIE PENSION FUNDNo. 10-4475UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 12:47 pm by John G. Papianou
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a complaint in which the plaintiff alleged the corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) in his home, used to transport gas, is defective because it is vulnerable to perforation from lightning strikes. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
Transamerica Assurance Corporation Plaintiff v Settlement Capital Corporation Defendant-Appelant, UNted States of America Defendant-Appellee, Gary Steele Defendant  United States Court of Appeals 6th Circuit, decided June 5, 2007 Download 6thCircuitDecision.pdf The Court stated that the question is whether the circumstances of this case implicate sovereign immunity under the formulations of  seminal soverign… [read post]