Search for: "United States of America v. Garcia" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 8:40 am by Steve Hall
The United States, as one of about 160 countries that signed the treaty, is obligated to notify foreign nationals who are arrested in the United States of their right to speak with their embassies. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am by Michael Price
As the Senate Foreign Relations Committee put it: For many years, the United States has embarrassed itself by excluding prominent foreigners from visiting the United States solely because of their political beliefs. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:39 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Williamson (Federal Tort Claims Act; Personal Injuries)Garcia v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of Landmark Legal Foundation Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Family Research Council   Harvey v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Leading scholars will offer brief reflections on the long history of black freedom movements, their significance to United States history more generally, and their relevance for today. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Garcia, which asks whether federal law pre-empts a state prosecution for identity theft for using someone else’s Social Security number. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Moving to Latin America, the floor was taken by Barbarita Guzmán, who focused on interaction between trade marks and copyright -- also considering the ‘moral rights’ issue in Bolivia, Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Washington, a constitutional challenge to a “faithless elector” law that threatens to fine electors who vote contrary to how state law directs, “the Supreme Court will decide whether to completely reshape how the American public elects the president of the United States, and the 2020 election—one of enormous consequence—will be the test run for the new rules. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 8:02 am by Elliot Setzer
Elizabeth Threlkeld analyzed the two different deals the United States recently made with the Taliban and the Afghan government. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Affinity appealed to thiscourt and the Director of the United States Patent andTrademark Office (Director) intervened. [read post]