Search for: "United States v. Alfred"
Results 21 - 40
of 233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
And that's what I conveyed in the letter to the United States Attorney, that that was where our concern was coming from. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:07 am
TMC obtained a concurrent use registration for the entire United States except for the state of Oklahoma. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:30 am
" —Alfred L. [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 2:42 pm
The court stated the FDA might pursue a number of alternatives without excessive First Amendment restrictions. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:42 am
United States of America), 2008 Alfred Boll, Nottebohm (Lichtenstein v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 43. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
AdamsCase number: 13-cv-12856 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan)Case filed: July 1, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: July 19, 2013 8/16/2013 11/14/2013 2013-71 SEC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1939 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 9:38 am
United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233(1945); see also Van Cauwenberghe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:44 am
The Court in its ruling relied in large part on a recent United States Supreme Court decision, Rothgery v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
United States, 128 S. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:18 pm
Venezuela) Sherzod Shadikhodjaev, United States—Safeguard Measure on Imports of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products Michelle Foster, D.Z. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
You haven't heard his name before and no one in the United States has even cared enough to make a Wikipedia page for him in English, even though our museums are full of works that passed through his hands. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:08 am
Where the complainant has registered the trademark with “the United States Patent and Trademark Office (or a comparable foreign trademark office)”, the respondent has the burden of rebutting the presumption of validity, Town of Easton Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 8:59 am
Avanci decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which affirmed the lower court's result--the dismissal of Conti's case--and even identified an additional reason. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
“The Noerr-Pennington doctrine protects the right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to petition the government for governmental action, including through litigation and activity incidental to litigation” (Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d 67, 77 [citation omitted]; see Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d 101, 106-107). [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Facts: This case (Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae …. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:56 pm
Harbor Freight sells tools and related products at over 400 retail stores throughout the United States. [read post]
