Search for: "United States v. Amin"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2014, 6:55 am
Following the recent filing of a petition for rehearing en banc by the detainees in the Allaithi v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
Jude Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
Most lawyers in the United States would think it malpractice to engage in such a practice. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Mohammed Mark Amin, Robert Reza Amin, Michael Mahmood Amin, Sam Saeed Pirnazar, Mary Teresa Coley, and Ali Tashakori Case number: 12-cv-3960 (United States District Court for the Central District of California) Case filed: May 8, 2012 Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 1, 2012 08/01/2012 10/30/2012 2012-81 In the Matter of Harbinger Capital Partners, LLC … [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:12 am
Richardson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:59 pm
And maybe he is.But it was John Roberts, no fan of my clients, who wrote this a couple of years ago in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
The government complied and responded with one sentence informing the court that “all three petitioners in the above-captioned cases are still in the custody and control of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:50 am
They based their claim on Article 3 but relied by analogy on the high duty to investigate that arose under article 2 of the ECHR when a suicide had occurred as illustrated in R(Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2003] and in R (L (A Patient)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] AC 588. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:18 am
El-Amin v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
First, section 1021 of the NDAA “affirm[ed]” the AUMF’s grant of authority for: Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the laws of war. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm
Maybe the End of Times, for False Marking Suits Under the America Invents Act, "Only the United States may sue for statutory damages. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
On the other hand, “a disclaimer should not remove more than is necessary […] to restore novelty […]” (see G 1/03 [headnote 2.2] and [3]).[5.5.1] The second paragraph of G 1/03 [3] states“However, the only justification for the disclaimer is to exclude a novelty-destroying disclosure […]. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
Dr Amin was the consultant for Mr Nassery during his hospital admissions. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
LGBTKF4754.5 .K59Gay and lesbian elders : history, law, and identity politics in the United States / Nancy J. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
” (U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 6:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am
United States Steel Corp., 15 N.J. 301, 311 (1954)]. [read post]
