Search for: "United States v. Brad Majors"
Results 21 - 40
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2018, 10:30 am
And, the United States could eliminate increased federal spending on premium subsidies for higher-priced ACA exchange coverage. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:15 am
In a recent Forbes article, Brad Newberg discussed in depth the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Petrella v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Brad A. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
Many owners of Parkland condo developments experience major problems. . . . [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
This is the second major loss for the Epic-Spotify-Tinder Coalition for App Fairness this month. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:34 pm
See Blumenthal v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
As a result, the Nokia v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm
Srinivasan challenges Phillips’ third contention, suggesting that United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:39 am
The right to consular notification by a foreign citizen detained by law enforcement is a part of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations at the express insistence of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:43 am
By Brad Rosen, J.D. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm
Many owners of Parkland condo developments experience major problems. . . . [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am
SEC, the Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that the SEC’s administrative law judges (“ALJ”) are “officers of the United States,” and thereby subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
See United States ex rel. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
These are commonly viewed as “rights,” and a major purpose of a constitution is thought to be the safeguarding of rights against what is often, especially in the United States, termed the “tyranny of the majority. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am
James Pohl’s April 25 ruling denying defendant Mustafa al-Hawsawi’s defense motion to dismiss in United States v. al-Hawsawi; the legal weight of reports that “major combat operations” have concluded in Iraq; and the contours of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis’s report on the future of detainee policy, among others. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:27 am
The United States Supreme Court made it abundantly clear, in the case of Troxel v. [read post]
