Search for: "United States v. Chemicals for Research and Industry"
Results 21 - 40
of 246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 8:30 am
If it does not “ ‘give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice’ ” of its scope, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:08 am
Meritor, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Northern District of Mississippi – February 11th, 2019) involves damages to homes allegedly caused the operation of an industrial facility. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am
The bill gives researchers who are approved for Schedules II through V the authorization to conduct research on marijuana. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
” “[P]urposes not prohibited by this chapter” is defined as“[a]ny peaceful purpose related to an industrial, agricultural, research, medical, or pharmaceutical activity or other activity,” and other specific purposes. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm
It ranks 17th among the top 20 chemicals produced in the United States, according to the federal government. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
The Milwards appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
The case exemplifying this is United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
After a four-day bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware found claim 8 of U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
I have met great colleagues whose research tests conventional boundaries of law and legality. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:19 pm
Board members were selected to represent EU Member States, EC DGs and agencies, NSC, and industry (notably through BIAC). [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
This language came dangerously close to swallowing an industry extolled for democratizing science and helping the United States overcome its PPE shortage in the heart of the COVID-19 outbreak. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
Pursuant to Section 337(a)(2), the complainant can establish the domestic industry requirement by demonstrating that “an industry in the United States, relating to the articles protected by the patent, copyright, [or] trademark . . . exists or is in the process of being established. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
An Uphill Battle to Ban Glyphosate in the United States Despite evidence of its carcinogenic properties, glyphosate is remains legal in the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am
It was in the highest appellate court in the land, the United States Supreme Court, that the final word was handed down. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 6:56 am
Asbestos has not been produced in the United States for decades, and while it is still being imported in small quantities, the real danger lies in the asbestos that fills many of the older buildings in Boston and the rest of the nation. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
I have great respect for all four of these researchers, and have met three of them. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
” And, more to the point, “[a]n authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]
