Search for: "United States v. Cline" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
In the final words of her summation, the Assistant United States Attorney (`AUSA’) argued that proof of the connection between Zhyltsou and the Gmail address could be found on Zhyltsou's ‘own Russian Facebook page’:`It has the defendant's profile picture on it. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
  In Cline – answering questions of state law certified to it by the United States Supreme Court – the Oklahoma Supreme Court had nothing but good things to say about off-label use.Cline was somewhat different than Abbottin its facts. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am by Girardeau Spann
After having de­clined in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:48 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
But it took nearly a century and a half of United States history for the first female federal judges to break the judicial glass ceiling. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Monday, July 11, 2022, at 3:30 p.m. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal Western District Court for Texas calls the United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(Cordis) and Wyeth (collectively, Appellants) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Dela- ware granting summary judgment that certain claims of U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
United States, and perhaps implicating the twice-relisted Woodward v. [read post]