Search for: "United States v. David Johnston"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
Scarcely less sad is the scrap over the annotated statute laws of the State of Georgia, recorded by Andy Johnstone on the same weblog. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
United States CNN reports that Stormy Daniels has reached a settlement with Michael Cohen and Keith Davidson, her former attorney, in her lawsuit that accused both men of working together to protect President Donald Trump. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process claims. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
David L. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
See David Kaye & David Freedman, “Reference Guide on Statistics,” in F.J.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm
On 26 March 2014, Sir David Eady gave judgment following the meaning trial in the case of Johnston v League Publications Ltd & Ors ([2014] EWHC 874 (QB)). [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Johnston did not follow the holding in this case. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Last week, we reported on the Bar Standards Board’s disbarring of barrister David Harris, who tweeted as @geeklawyer. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[16] Moreover, unlike the theory prevalent in the United States today, the Romans were not concerned with writing down laws for the masses to read for themselves. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
United States Dep’t of Labor Bull. [read post]
