Search for: "United States v. Euring" Results 21 - 40 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2012, 8:51 am by SJM
However, there was no breach of Article 13 as regards the civil proceedings as the Applicants had an effective remedy, albeit the outcome was unfavourable to them.In terms of just satisfaction, the Court’s award ranged from EUR 10000 to EUR 20000 for non-pecuniary damage and various amounts were awarded for pecuniary loss.This case usefully adds a potential ECHR ground to any claim brought against a public body under the Rylands v Fletcher rule. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Austria, 13470/87, 20 September 1994; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 17419/90, 25 November 1996; İ.A. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Related posts:Canadian Case on State Immunity In Kazemi (Estate of) v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:02 am by INFORRM
However, Pihl sued the association and claimed symbolic damages of 1 Swedish krona (SEK), approximately 0.10 euro (EUR). [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no. 19859/04)STRASBOURG 9 February 2010This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:20 am by Milen Hristov
For 2012 the figures are as follows: minimum driver monthly salary of 208 EUR per month. minimum monthly NI and health insurance contributions of 104 EUR per month per driver. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
This judgment seems fallacious in relying on Walden v Fiore as this judgment doesn’t cover situations where the defendant has minimum contacts with the United States and any of the states within itself. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm by Bartolus
301/06 Ireland v Parliament and Council [2009] ECR I-593, paragraph 64; United Kingdom v Parliament and Council, paragraphs 60 to 64). [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In this post, we look at how different medical bodies, specifically those in Europe (the European Medicines Agency (EMA) ) and in the United States (the FDA) look at evidence that might be considered "clear and convincing. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:40 am
United Kingdom, 24 Eur. [read post]