Search for: "United States v. Feinberg" Results 21 - 40 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm by Ruck DeMinico
Role The United States Coast Guard (“USCG”) has designated BP Exploration & Production, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Steinbach, once a litigation partner Williams & Connolly LLP and latterly a teacher of United States History and American Government courses at the Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, on how United States history can also be taught and understood by focusing on constitutional history (YouTube). [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
November 24, 2008) (Feinberg, Newman, Cabranes, CJJ)This trio of long opinions, captioned In re Terrorist Bombings of U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Jordan Brunner
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Ken Feinberg, speaking at a symposium on mass torts, asks what legal challenges do mass torts confront in the federal courts. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
The Pakistani embassy in the United States warned the U.S. against using it as a “scapegoat” to explain challenges in Afghanistan. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm by Garrett Hinck
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Matthew Kahn flagged the government’s motion to limine in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:45 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence Union Officer's Prior Bad Acts Admissible to Show Intent in Trial for Hobbs Act Extortion, Embezzlement United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:31 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence Union Officer's Prior Bad Acts Admissible to Show Intent in Trial for Hobbs Act Extortion, Embezzlement United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:25 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeStatements Were Voluntary, Coercive Tactics Not 'Undue'; Statements Denied Suppression United States v. [read post]