Search for: "United States v. Fitch"
Results 21 - 40
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2015, 5:31 am
In the Supreme Court decision of Oncale v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:22 pm
Relying on EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 135 S. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:12 am
The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) sued Abercrombie, claiming its decision not to hire Ms. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:45 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers "may not make an applicant's religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:25 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:25 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:35 am
(For Exhibit A, see Burwell v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
United States is a case originating near Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, “turned out to be one of those narrow decisions that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has touted as the way to achieve greater unanimity. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States and EEOC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.) [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
United States, reversing a Pennsylvania man’s conviction for making threats on Facebook. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
The case, EEOC v. [read post]
