Search for: "United States v. Hatch"
Results 21 - 40
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
United States Forest Service, 535 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc), and the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:48 am
Our Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
” The court noted that the defendant made and sold generic pharmaceutical products which are distributed in the United States, including Delaware. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:33 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:28 am
(Apotex) appeals the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissing its declaratory judgment action for noninfringement against Plaintiffs-Appellees Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V. and Janssen, L.P. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
Sure, the California Supreme Court said X in Hatch, and this case is very much like X, and as a general matter, lower state courts are bound to follow superior state tribunals.But not when there's an intervening decision of an even higher court; in this case, the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:26 pm
15 Apr 2010, 5:20 am
United States, 491 F.3d 1327, 1330 (Fed. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
We previously reported on developments in various United States Courts of Appeal decisions concerning reverse payments in Hatch-Waxman litigation settlements - that is, payments made by branded pharmaceutical patent holders to generic challengers to postpone market entry of the generic product. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:31 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:33 pm
United States, 77 Fed. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:05 pm
Ct. 1740 (2011), and Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:51 pm
Department of Justice (Solicitor General of the United States) to weigh in on generic drug preemption. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
Last year the United States Supreme Court held in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
DNJ Court Denies Request for Early Summary Judgment Finding Motion Made Mid-Fact Discovery Premature
29 Sep 2022, 6:15 am
Agreeing with the plaintiff’s position, United States Magistrate Judge José R. [read post]
DNJ Court Denies Request for Early Summary Judgment Finding Motion Made Mid-Fact Discovery Premature
29 Sep 2022, 6:15 am
Agreeing with the plaintiff’s position, United States Magistrate Judge José R. [read post]
DNJ Court Denies Request for Early Summary Judgment Finding Motion Made Mid-Fact Discovery Premature
29 Sep 2022, 6:15 am
Agreeing with the plaintiff’s position, United States Magistrate Judge José R. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
This question is at the core of the case of Sufi and Elmi v United Kingdom, in which the Strasbourg Court has ruled that the state of chaos prevailing in Somalia is so dire that repatriation there would amount to a breach of the prohibition on torture and inhuman treatment under Article 3. [read post]
