Search for: "United States v. Maines"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am
The ADA was not intended to create equality by bringing everyone down to the same low level of participation in the economic and social life of the United States. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:53 am
And if you think that Israel is having a hard time with “Palestinian peaceful protesters”. just wait until China invades Taiwan and the word goes out from TikTok to Gaza by the Potomac to start condemning the Taiwanese breakaway province and imperialist protectorate of the evil United States. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm
United States Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456 (Fed. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 2:43 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am
KPRC 2 Investigates cites a 2019 three-page internal report prepared at the time by HPD Commander David Angelo to the Department’s Command Staff, which states: “One of the main reasons this was done [the merger of the units) was to address the growing backlog of suspended child sexual abuse cases due to a lack of manpower in the unit. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
In response to the law, attorney generals from 16 other states have threatened Maine with litigation. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:48 am
Last month, in Woodard v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Jackson, which has been consolidated under United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:26 pm
The case, Grants Pass v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:12 am
In Alden v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
In the United States, once a juror is officially empaneled and sworn in for a trial, they cannot simply “quit” or voluntarily leave their duty without facing potential legal consequences. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
In the United States, once a juror is officially empaneled and sworn in for a trial, they cannot simply “quit” or voluntarily leave their duty without facing potential legal consequences. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
In the United States, once a juror is officially empaneled and sworn in for a trial, they cannot simply “quit” or voluntarily leave their duty without facing potential legal consequences. [read post]
