Search for: "United States v. Petersen"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2016, 7:57 pm
Petersen, 123 So.2d 251, 253 (Fla.1960); Goodman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:21 am
Erhard Milch), and NMT 4 (U.S.A. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:17 am
EDISON, Inc., v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 7:04 am
Two defendants (Nebelung and Petersen) proved to be quite elusive. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:06 am
So held a federal district judge last week in Petersen v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The World Trademark Review's blog caught the Kat's eye earlier this week with news that President Barack Obama has taken time off from his golfing commitments to nominate a new IP czar (technically "Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator"), Kilpatrick Townsend's Daniel Marti, though Merpel thinks he got back to the links in time to avoid choosing a new Director for the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Petersen Publ'g Co. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:35 am
In Dilts v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 8:00 am
Petersen v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am
District Judge Barbara Crabb of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin issued an order denying the plaintiffs’ motion for class and collective action certification of unpaid meal period claims in Boelk, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:26 am
By Travis Anderson and Shannon Petersen In Flores v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:23 am
First State Ins. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
That is the issue that will be argued tomorrow before the Alaska Supreme Court in Petersen v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:02 am
There are a thousand thoughts lying within a man that he does not know till he takes up a pen to write. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
As he well knows, such terms have very precise meaning under US law, and by that metric - one that's extremely favorable for American companies, by the way - only a small minority of Chinese imports into the United States are "unfairly traded. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
