Search for: "United States v. Pike"
Results 21 - 40
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2022, 1:09 pm
Ross, 21-468Issues: (1) Whether allegations that a state law has dramatic economic effects largely outside of the state and requires pervasive changes to an integrated nationwide industry state a violation of the dormant commerce clause, or whether the extraterritoriality principle described in the Supreme Court’s decisions is now a dead letter; and (2) whether such allegations, concerning a law that is based solely on preferences regarding out-of-state… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
United States as if it put to rest the serious First Amendment concerns prepublication review raises. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 2:29 pm
United States, Travis Tuggle claims that federal agents – without a warrant – maintained around-the-clock video surveillance of his home for 18 months. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
Section 1226(a) provides that “an alien may be arrested and detained pending a decision on whether the alien is to be removed from the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 11:14 am
See Pike v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
(Please note that these filing figures represent federal court filings only; the figures do not include separate state court class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:01 pm
Maya v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:15 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 2:19 pm
Ass'n of Mayors v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:54 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has interpreted the Sixth Amendment and the First Amendment as imposing a presumption that criminal trials, including voir dire, will be open to the public. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Indeed, one expert in the employ of the United States government, who would go on to become a major testifying expert witness for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, opined in a 1973 publication, that mesothelioma was a problem limited to exposure to South African crocidolite, which was not in every asbestos-containing insulation product.[9] In any event, Judge Wisdom never directly addressed Section 388, and the framing of the Borel case as a consumer case prevailed. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
United States, 409 U.S. 322, 328 (1973). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Pike v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 8:01 pm
Ehemann Real Estatet, Ltd v Anderson Township Zoning Commission, 2020 WL 1488722 (OH App. 3/25/2020) [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
United States, which considered the separate-sovereigns exception to double jeopardy, Thomas wrote separately “to address the proper role of the doctrine of stare decisis. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
