Search for: "United States v. Ritz" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-5756, is a spin-off of last Term’s Johnson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm by James Kwong
Jordan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-5238, out of the way. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am by Victoria Kwan
Shifting our review to the United States, Justice Sonia Sotomayor read the Declaration of Independence for Heritage Day at the Oysterponds Historical Society in Orient, New York. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]