Search for: "United States v. Sheehan"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 6:16 am
The case is a criminal one, State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:55 am
While the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has declared that the term “sex” in Title VII includes transgender protection, that interpretation hasn’t been vetted extensively by the courts and may not be resolved until United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
Finally, “embarrass” means “to cause to experience a state of self-conscious distress. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
Commentary comes from Eleanor Sheehan at popsugar. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm
An Article I wrote in 2001 Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the… [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In a recent case, San Francisco v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
The scenario above roughly describes the constitutional regulation of police use of force in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:00 pm
The Japanese automotive manufacturer, Toyota, produces the vehicles that are high in demand throughout the United States today. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am
A few years ago the New York Times Bill Neuman wrote article an article on raw milk cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy… [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:16 pm
United States, May 18, 2015, 9-0. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:55 am
Wynne, striking down a portion of Maryland’s personal income tax scheme; he suggests that it “shows the justices hard at work at the job they were nominated and confirmed to do: interpreting and applying the constitution of the United States. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
United States, in which the Court held that an individual who surrenders his guns to police and is then convicted of a felony has the right to transfer those guns to an independent third party, including by selling them. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:58 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court's opinion in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
United States. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:06 am
United States, No. 13-1487. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:32 am
United States, No. 13-1487: When the defendant has been convicted of a felony and can no longer legally possess firearms, and his guns have been seized by the government, "a court may approve the transfer of a felon's guns consistently with §922(g) if, but only if, the recipient will not grant the felon control over those weapons. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Brumfield v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:38 am
At Cato at Liberty, Walter Olson weighs in on Wednesday’s opinion in Young v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:14 am
Sheehan. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:24 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Amanda Hollis-Brusky argues that, although the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
